Yes, that's right. Every person makes mistakes, and we humans are dafaür thinking distinguishes a human being. Mr. Galliano's very talented, say the experts, designing beautiful clothes, say the ladies who wear them, or want to take time ...Of course, one must know what they say, but sometimes it does to oneself then again sorry if you have something spoken, but that really did not want to say and especially then, when you yourself do not stand behind his statement and the does not Mr. Galliano.Not only he is a so-called debt, but the company for which he was always there, I want to run no name dropping, but every knows it anyway, when he was needed he was there, and it is not justified in my opinion to dismiss an employee if he is in trouble and the WAR Mr. Galliano. On the contrary! The company has a moral OBLIGATION to absorb its employees, and render all assistance that is the only possible thing ansich.So far so good. Perhaps even now you can find a way to help him in some way, morally, for he must have gone through hell.I have an IDEA for compensation.Anna is the right way. Always.
What intrigues me at this post is the italic underlined and bold part. Does LVMH have the obligation to take care of John Galliano in a manner that this post insinuates?
In intrigues me because I just read a volume of Jon Gordon books. Books, that seem target business manager types, like "The Energy Bus", "The No Complaining Rule", and "The Soup" all suggests that leaders in general should serve their charges and develop them not only to be an essential part of the team, but a better human being as well. So what when they go out of the group to do stuff, they'll do it excellently.
I wonder, if LVMH actually helped rehabilitate Galliano (after dealing with the French laws), would Raf Simmons remain Raf Simmons?
One can wonder yes?
No comments:
Post a Comment